Richard Branson's Little Letter

    The letter written by entrepreneur Richard Branson is very heartfelt and compelling. The reader will appreciate the down-to-earth language that was used by Branson throughout the letter and the easy-to-read sentence structure that he chose to use as well. 

The purpose of Branson writing this letter seems to be to give hope to a possibly lonely person who is struggling with hardships in their life. The author is successful at creating an optimistic and inspiring tone throughout the entire letter. He does this by using very touching phrases and words that could help lift the reader out of a slum they may be in. Examples of the phrases he chose are “Be healthy” and also “Be there for someone” these phrases and other linguistic choices that Branson used help show Branson’s purpose in writing the letter. By the end of the letter, the reader is left with a sense of hope and happiness because of the inspiring ideas and lessons that Branson teaches through a short letter to a stranger. Branson displays pathos perfectly throughout his writing as he writes about things that will affect people on an emotional level. 

Branson often attempts to connect to the audience and he does so through his simplistic language choice and his heartfelt message which is specifically directed to the reader. The author uses questions to address the audience and seems as though he is speaking more to a specific person rather than a large audience. Another way that he addresses the audience is by using specific words like “Your” and “Yourself.” This makes the reader think that they are communicating with Branson and that he is giving them the information. 

The structure that Branson uses makes it so that any reader from any background is able to understand and comprehend the message that he is sending to the audience. Branson often uses less formal language and simple small sentences which make the whole letter seem as if Branson is speaking to an old friend or colleague. He often uses smaller paragraphs which each seem to be helpful to the reader as he gives new advice in each paragraph about how the reader can lift their level of happiness. Having these small paragraphs which are filled with impactful pieces of helpful information connects to the reader more personally. I found it very interesting that Branson was able to talk about something completely different in every paragraph of the letter. He goes from speaking on how people should identify happiness within their lives to then speaking about how they can achieve it. 

The form is very clear to the reader that it is a letter which tells the reader a lot about what they’re going to read right away. The reader will instantly notice that the writing is non formal and that Branson is addressing anyone by his use of “Dear Stranger” as the first words to address the audience. By seeing this the reader can infer that Branson is going to speak non formally and that the letter is addressed to anyone.


Comments

  1. Hi Gavin, starting your blog was good.
    A01: In addressing meaning and context I would say you do so in a detailed way, based on how you start your blog. Here you say, “The letter written by entrepreneur Richard Branson is very heartfelt and compelling. The reader will appreciate the down-to-earth language that was used by Branson throughout the letter and the easy-to-read sentence structure that he chose to use as well.” With this, you are giving your summary and explaining what you just had read, very good job. Additionally, speaking about the amount of evidence you used and how long they were, was very effective. You used a great amount of evidence, as you quoted in each paragraph, and also explained them very well, but the most effective part is that your quotes were very short. For example, “Be healthy”’ is a quote that you used. By doing this you are proving that you understand what you read and you can explain just two words in a whole paragraph. I would give you 4 marks.
    A03: Within explaining and expanding on the evidence that you used, you did an excellent job. After each quotation, you provide a perfect amount of evidence to support what you were claiming. This makes your blog very strong. In regards to relating things to the audience, you did a great job. As you state, “the reader is left with” here showing that you know what the author is enabling the audience to feel, understand, or know. Good job, the only advice I would give for that is for you to say who the audience could be. Like the type of people that would read the letter. In terms of form, structure, and language you flatly stated “form” and “structure” but never said language, which is okay because you slightly went over it. While you correctly discussed structure and form, the language lacked buzzwords and terminology. In the future, I would suggest that you would up your vocabulary to make your blog strong as you just talked about meaning. I would give you 11 marks.

    Good Job! 15/25.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Gavin
    AO1- 3 marks. It was good on how you identify the tone, audience, and the structure. You also include important details from the text “writes about things that will affect people on an emotional level.” You included your own interpretation of the author’s characteristic features. However, but use very little direct quotes from the text to support each of your ideas. This would then strengthen and help you be able to gain more points. Overall, this shows only a clear understanding of the text for the meaning, context, and audience. Therefore, I would give you 3 marks.

    AO3- 8 marks. I felt like some of your points were a bit repetitive and didn’t have much evidence to support your claims. In the last paragraph, you repeat that Branson’s letter is non formal and addressed to anyone twice. Aswell as your paragraphs only cover the bare minimum and include one reference to each of the writer’s stylistic choices in which you could’ve been more in depth. Also, as well as not including direct quotes from the text it weakens your claims and you don’t have anything to back them up. With this being said, you have a limited awareness of the writer’s stylistic choices and a limited analysis. I would then give you 8 marks. Your total would be 11/25 which is so far good, I would just include more in depth details for next time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment